Shoplifting 927/23
OFFICIAL
FOI Reference: 927/2023
Request:
1.
- a) How many instances of theft from retailers (shoplifting) were reported to your force between 1st January 2023 & 30th September 2023. Please break it down by month.
- b) Of these reported incidences of theft from retailers (shoplifting) how many were attended by a police officer? Please break it down by month.
- a) How many instances of common assault, actual bodily harm or grievous bodily harm/wounding against retail staff while they were at work were reported to your force between 1st January 2023 & 30th September 2023. Please break it down by month and type of offence.
- b) Of these reported incidences of common assault, actual bodily harm or grievous bodily harm/wounding against retail staff while they were at work, how many were attended by a police officer? Please break it down by month and type of offence.
Response:
Section 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 places two duties on public authorities. Unless exemptions apply, the first duty at Section 1(1) (a) is to confirm or deny whether the information specified in a request is held. The second duty at Section 1(1) (b) is to disclose information that has been confirmed as being held.
Where exemptions are relied upon Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires Dyfed-Powys Police, when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt) to provide you the applicant with a notice which:
(a) states that fact,
(b) specifies the exemption in question and
(c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information you have requested. However, we are withholding the whole of the requested information since we consider that the Section 12(1) exemption the Cost of Compliance exceeds the Appropriate Limit applies to it.
Section 12 (1) – The cost of compliance exceeds the Appropriate Limit
Section 12(1) states: “…Section 1 (1) does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit.”
The cost of providing you with the information requested in respect of your request is above the amount to which we are legally required to respond i.e. the cost of locating and retrieving the information exceeds the “appropriate level” as stated in the Freedom of Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004. It is estimated that it would exceed 18 hours (i.e. minimum 2,028.17 hours) to comply with this part of your request. The regulations can be located @
www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2004/20043244.htm
Due to a change in systems during 2023 the response has been split into two seperare answers, one to cover the data held on the previous system (up to 12/05/23) and the other to cover data held on the new system (post 12/05/2023).
Previous system
The Freedom of Information Department has been advised that the information in relation to Question 2B is not held in an easily retrievable format. This is due to the fact that occupation is a non-mandatory field and therefore all common assault, actual bodily harm and grievous bodily harm offences would require interrogation in order to establish the occupation of the victim is recorded.
It has been established that there are a total of 7,705 records that would require individual interrogation and it has been estimated that it would take a minimum of 10 minutes to research each individual record. The relevant time estimate is detailed below:
01/01/23 – 12/05/23: 7705 crimes x 10 minutes per record = 1284.16 hours
Current system
The Freedom of Information Department has been advised that the information in relation to the whole request is not held in an easily retrievable format. This is due to the fact that all relevant crimes would require interrogation in order to establish if the thefts related to a shop and if the assaults related to retail worker.
It has been established that there are a total of 4,363 records that would require individual interrogation and it has been estimated that it would take a minimum of 10 minutes to research each individual record. The relevant time estimate is detailed below:
12/05/2023 – 30/09/2023: 4,363 crimes x 10 minutes per record = 727.17 hours
Total time estimate to complete whole request = 2,028.17 hours
Question 1 (01/01/23 – 12/05/23 only):
The relevant department have advised that a response can be provided within the appropriate time limit, i.e.18 hours. Although we are unable to confirm at this time whether or not the number of shoplifting offences attended by a police officer can be retrieved within 18 hours.
In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, this letter acts as a Refusal Notice for the WHOLE of this request under Section 17(5) A public authority which, in relation to any request for information, is relying on a claim that section 12 or section 14 applies must, within the time for complying with section 1(1), give the applicant a notice stating that fact.
You may wish to refine and resubmit your request so that it reduces the time shown above to fall within the 18 hours.
Should you require any further advice in relation to this matter please don’t hesitate to contact me.
Please also be advised that should the request be refined, it does not remove the Force’s right to cite exemptions if relevant.
It should be noted that as a result of the systems adopted by Dyfed-Powys Police in relation to the recording of such information that the information released may or may not be accurate.
Furthermore, it should also be noted that Police forces in the United Kingdom are routinely required to provide crime statistics to government bodies and the recording criteria is set nationally. However, the systems used for recording these figures are not generic, nor are the procedures used locally in capturing the crime data. It should be noted that for these reasons this force's response to your questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other response you may receive.
(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 01/02/2024)