Force Structure and Units 410/2024

JavaScript is not enabled

Without JavaScript enabled forms will not work.

FOI Reference: 410/2024

Request:

1. Does your force have the following units and please can you answer the additional questions:

a. Tactical Surveillance Unit– Yes/ No

i. Shared Resource – Yes/ No, With who: ___________________

ii. Name of Unit Head: __________________________

iii. Unit Contact Number: _____________________________

iv. Budget for 2024/2025: £ ______________

b. Counter Terrorism Unit– Yes/ No

i. Shared Resource – Yes/ No, With who: ___________________

ii. Name of Unit Head: __________________________

iii. Unit Contact Number: _____________________________

iv. Budget for 2024/2025: £ ______________

c. Armed Response Unit– Yes/ No

i. Shared Resource – Yes/ No, With who: _____________________

ii. Name of Unit Head: __________________________

iii. Unit Contact Number: _____________________________

iv. Budget for 2024/2025: £ ______________

d. Special Operations Unit– Yes/ No

i. Shared Resource – Yes/ No, With who: ____________________

ii. Name of Unit Head: __________________________

iii. Unit Contact Number: _____________________________

iv. Budget for 2024/2025: £ ______________

e. Organised Crimes Unit– Yes/ No

i. Shared Resource – Yes/ No, With who: ______________________

ii. Name of Unit Head: __________________________

iii. Unit Contact Number: _____________________________

iv. Budget for 2024/2025: £ ______________

2. Please provide an up to date organisation chart of the Unit Structure of the Force.

Response:

I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested; however we are exempting part of the information as we believe that the following exemption is relevant:

Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires Dyfed-Powys Police,

when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt), to

provide you the applicant with a notice which:

states that fact,
specifies the exemption in question and
states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.

The following exemptions apply to the disclosure of the information:

S24(1) - National Security

S31(1)(a)(b) - Law Enforcement

Overall Evidence of Harm

A Freedom of Information Act request is not a private transaction. Both the request itself and any information disclosed, are considered suitable for open publication. This is because, under the Act, any information disclosed is released into the wider public domain, effectively to the world, not just to an individual. Whilst not questioning the motives of the applicant, by providing budgetary costs assigned to counter-terrorism could allow those who seek to cause harm to members of the public to gain an understanding of the level of resources employed to mitigate the threat of an attack. This could then allow terrorists/extremists with the time and inclination over a period of years to try to map whether costs are increasing or decreasing year on year.

To disclose the requested information would have a negative effect on the safety of the general public should the release of information be used and manipulated to try and attack individuals and establishments, for example through mapping counter terrorism budget across forces. Disclosure may lead to an attack on establishments within locations where one force is viewed to have lower costs per year on counter terrorism, as these locations may be viewed as a 'weak/vulnerable target' with less policing resources allocated.

The threat from terrorism cannot be ignored. It should be recognised that the international security landscape is increasingly complex and unpredictable. The UK faces a sustained threat from violent terrorists and extremists. Since 2006, the UK Government have published the threat level, which is currently set to ‘substantial’ meaning “a terrorist attack is likely.’

In consideration of the ramifications of this threat level, it would not be wise to release details of the budget allocated to counter terrorism units, as to do so could compromise the current or future law enforcement role of the police. Modern-day policing is intelligence-led and information of this nature, needs to be treated with extreme sensitivity as it could have a detrimental effect on the operational effectiveness of the police. There are significant risks associated with the release of such information as this may provide those seeking to commit criminal acts with an advantage over the police, as the information can indeed be viewed as operationally sensitive. Disclosure could have a negative effect on police’s ability to provide the necessary service required should the release of information be used and manipulated by those with criminal or terrorist intent to try and attack individuals or establishments. To disclose the requested information would therefore provide the opportunity of disrupting police activity.

As stated previously, the UK faces a serious and sustained threat from violent extremists. The police have a duty to promote the safety of all individuals. Therefore, to release information held would allow interested parties to gain an awareness of policing decisions used to safeguard national security. National security encompasses a wide spectrum and it is our duty to protect the people within the UK and abroad. Public safety is of paramount importance to the policing purpose and must be taken into account in deciding whether to disclose information. Providing details relating to budgetary costs in this specific area, could potentially be misused proving detrimental to national security.

In the current environment of an increased threat of terrorist activity, providing any details that could assist an extremist, terrorist faction or fixated individual who have the relevant time and know-how, would put people’s lives at risk.

Public Interest Test

Factors favouring disclosure for S24

The information simply relates to national security and disclosure would not actually harm it. Disclosing the information would allow individuals to contribute to more accurate public debate on matters that are of public relevance - in this case information pertinent to counter-terrorism. The public are entitled to know how public funds are spent and what measures are in place in safeguarding national security.

Factors favouring non-disclosure for S24

The public interest is not what interests the public but what will be of greater good if released to the community as a whole. It is not in the public interest to disclose information that may compromise the service's ability to accomplish one of its core functions of national security.

To release any policing arrangements of this nature would render security measures less effective. This would lead to the compromise of ongoing or future operations to protect the security or infra-structure of the UK and increase the risk of harm to either specific individuals or the general public as a whole.

In order to safeguard national security, there is a need for the police to protect information held as to release it would likely have a detrimental effect on policing resources, particularly in the sensitive area of national security.

Factors favouring disclosure for S31

Where public funds are being spent, there is a public interest in accountability and justifying the use of public money. For the police to be fully transparent and open, there is a public interest in providing information pertinent to budgetary allocation and in this case in regards to the funding for counter terrorism in 2024/25. To provide this figure and any breakdown of how the budget is allocated would provide the public with the knowledge that the police are appropriately using public funds to carry out their duties, specifically to combat terrorism.

Factors favouring non-disclosure for S31

By providing counter terrorism budgetary information and a breakdown of how this is allocated within Dyfed-Powys Police, would mean that there is a strong possibility that the current or future law enforcement role of police counter terrorism units will be compromised by the release of details. This would therefore, hinder the prevention and detection of crime. It can be argued that there are significant risks associated with providing information in relation to monetary resources pertaining to counter terrorism, since they may reveal the relative vulnerability of what we may be trying to protect.

To disclose the funding allocated for one year and then further disclosures for other years via repeat requests, would allow one to calculate whether funding is on the increase or decrease. Disclosure would therefore over time be releasing sensitive operational information into the public domain, which would enable those with the time, capacity and inclination to try and map strategies used by the police. Thus having a detrimental effect on our ability to prevent and detect crime.

Balancing Test

The security of the country is of paramount importance and Dyfed-Powys Police will not divulge information if to do so would place the safety of the public at risk, undermine National Security or law enforcement. Whilst there is a public interest in transparency and demonstrating that the police are justified and accountable in the use of funds to conduct the vital work they do and in this case providing assurance that the police service is appropriately and effectively engaging with the threat posed by terrorist activity, there is a very strong public interest in safeguarding both national security and the integrity of police operations in the highly sensitive area of combating terrorism and extremism.

As much as there is a public interest in knowing that policing activity is appropriate and balanced this will only be overridden in exceptional circumstances. Any disclosure of information relating to the police’s budget for this specialist area would undermine our ability to combat terrorism, which are sensitive issues of intelligence value to a terrorist. Disclosure would compromise the role, function and resources of the police and ultimately place individuals at risk at a national and international level.

Therefore, it is our opinion that for these reasons the balancing test favours non-disclosure of the requested information.

Response:

a. Tactical Surveillance Unit – Yes

i. Shared Resource – No

ii. Name of Unit Head: Section 31(1)(a)(b) – Law Enforcement

iii. Unit Contact Number: Section 31(1)(a)(b) – Law Enforcement