Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FOI Reference: 887/2022
Request:
During the last calendar years (2019-2021 and January 1st 2022 and 14th November 2022)
A) How many times have applications been made to the home office by PSA's (Pension Supervising Authority) for the forfeiture of part of the pension of a police officer, or former police officer who is, or was, a member of a police pension scheme? on behalf of the force
Who had
a) been convicted of a criminal offense committed in connection with their service as a member of a police force, and
b) the offense has been certified by the Secretary of State as either
i. liable to lead to a serious loss of confidence in the public
service; or
ii. gravely injurious to the interests of the State.
B) How many applications were approved
C) How many applications were rejected
Response:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, the details of which are as follows:
It should be noted that owing to the systems adopted by Dyfed-Powys Police in relation to the recording of such matters the information provided may or may not be accurate. It should be noted that for these reasons this Force’s response to your questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other response you may receive.
(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 12/12/22)