Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FOI Reference: 70/2022
Request:
I would like to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act into the number of stolen dogs reported in your constabulary in 2021.
I have detailed the request below:
Q1. Please state how many dogs were reported as stolen in your area in 2021:
2021 |
|
Reports of dogs being stolen |
Q2. Over the same timeframe, please state how many of these cases were resolved (i.e. the pet was returned to its owner):
2021 |
|
Cases of dogs being returned |
Q3. If possible, please state the three most commonly stolen breeds of dog and the number of each taken, in 2021:
Stolen dogs |
Breed #1 |
Breed #2 |
Breed #3 |
|||
Name |
Count |
Name |
Count |
Name |
Count |
|
2021 |
Response 1:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested as detailed below;
Dogs reported in 2021
Year |
Number of dogs stolen |
2021 |
82 |
*These are the number of dogs, not the number of reports/crimes. More than one dog may have been reported stolen for each report/crime.
Response 2:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested as detailed below.
Dogs stolen and returned
Year |
Number of dogs returned |
2021 |
13 |
Response 3:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested as detailed below, however we are exempting part of that information as we believe that the following exemptions are relevant as detailed below and explained at the end of this response:
Section 30(1)(a) Investigations and Proceedings conducted by Public Authorities
Most common breed stolen in 2021
Breed |
Number of dogs |
Border Collies |
7 |
cocker spaniel |
5 |
Chihuahua x terrier |
4 |
Labrador |
4 |
Jack russell |
4 |
Rottweiler |
4 |
Section 30 Exemption Applied x 22
Explanation of the applied exemptions:
Section 30(1)(a) Investigations and Proceedings conducted by Public Authorities:
Section 30(1)(a) is a class-based qualified exemption. This means that the legislators when writing the legislation considered that the release of such information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 would cause harm to the public authority or individual concerned. There is therefore no requirement to carry out a HARM Test in respect of such information. However there is a requirement to carry out a Public Interest Test in order to establish whether the public interest in maintaining the exemption may be outweighed by a wider public benefit in disclosure.
Public Interest Test
Considerations favouring disclosure:
Disclosure of the information would improve the public’s knowledge and awareness regarding the frequency of such crimes.
Considerations favouring non-disclosure:
This exemption covers information held at any time for the purpose of an investigation, whether the case is ongoing, closed or abandoned. To release details of an ongoing investigation, as in this case, could undermine and prejudice those investigations. This would impact on the forces’ future law enforcement capabilities by hindering the prevention or detection of crime.
Balancing Test
After considering the advantages and disadvantages in disclosure, it falls upon Dyfed-Powys Police to conduct a balance test on the issues. The strongest argument for disclosure, which is public awareness, needs to be weighed against the strongest arguments for non-disclosure, which in this case is that the release would undermine and prejudice an ongoing investigation, which would impact on the forces’ future law enforcement capabilities by hindering the prevention or detection of crime.
Therefore, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
It should be noted that as a result of the systems adopted by Dyfed-Powys Police in relation to the recording of such information that the information released may or may not be accurate.
Furthermore, it should also be noted that Police forces in the United Kingdom are routinely required to provide crime statistics to government bodies and the recording criteria is set nationally. However, the systems used for recording these figures are not generic, nor are the procedures used locally in capturing the crime data. It should be noted that for these reasons this force's response to your questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other response you may receive.
This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act and disclosed on the 16th February 2022.