Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FOI Reference: 376/2022
Request 1 - 10:
1. How many misconduct hearings were held by your police force in the financial years:
a. 2018- 2019
b. 2019-2020
c. 2020-2021
d. 2021-2022 (to date)
2. How many of the misconduct hearings above for the financial years between 2018-2022 ( to date) were held in private?
3. How many sexual misconduct cases were there in your police force in the financial years:
a. 2018-2019
b. 2019-2020
c. 2020- 2021
d. 2021- 2022 to date
4. How many officers were granted anonymity or were unnamed for sexual misconduct cases, can you break this down into male/female and other officers in the financial years from 2018-2022 ( to date)
5. How many officers were given a final written warning were given anonymity or were unnamed for sexual misconduct cases, can you break this down into male/female and other officers in the financial years from 2018-2022 (to date)
6. How many non-sexual misconducts hearings were held by your police force in the financial years:
a. 2018-2019
b. 2019-2020
c. 2020- 2021
d. 2021-2022 to date
7. How many officers dismissed for gross misconduct were granted anonymity or were unnamed in non-sexual misconduct cases in the financial years between 2018 -2022 ( to date). Can you break this down into gender male/female and other officers?
8. How many officers given a final written warning were granted anonymity or unnamed in non- sexual misconduct cases , can you break this down into gender male/female and other in the financial years 2018- 2022 ( to date)
9. How many officers dismissed for gross misconduct were named, can you break this down into gender of male/ female and other officers for the financial years
a. 2018-2019
b. 2019-2020
c. 2020- 2021
d. 2021-2022 (to date)
10. How many officers given a final written warning were named, can you break this down into male/female and other officers for financial years 2018-2022 ( to date)
Additional Request: How many officers dismissed for gross misconduct in sexual misconduct or special case hearings were given anonymity or were unnamed. Can you break this down into male/female and other officers in the financial years from 2018-2022 (to date). For clarity by cases I mean misconduct and special case hearings.
Response 1a - d:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
Financial Year |
Non Sexual Misconduct Hearings |
2018/19 |
2 |
2019/20 |
3 |
2020/21 |
5 |
2021/22 |
1 |
Please note: With regards to Hearings and Cases, the Misconduct Hearings may not necessarily have been held in the same financial year as the Misconduct case was recorded.
Response 2:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
A total of 1 misconduct hearings for the financial years between 2018-2022 ( to date) were held in private.
Response 3 a - d:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
Financial Year |
Sexual Misconduct Cases |
2018/19 |
3 |
2019/20 |
1 |
2020/21 |
5 |
2021/22 |
3 |
Response 4:
I can confirm that there is no information held by Dyfed-Powys Police due to the fact that zero (0) officers were granted anonymity or were unnamed for sexual misconduct cases during the timeframe specified.
Response 5:
I can confirm that there is no information held by Dyfed-Powys Police due to the fact that zero (0) officers given a final written warning were given anonymity or were unnamed for sexual misconduct cases in the timeframe specified.
Response 6 a - d:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
Financial Year |
Non Sexual Misconduct Hearings |
2018/19 |
2 |
2019/20 |
2 |
2020/21 |
4 |
021/22 |
1 |
Response 7:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
A total of one male officer was dismissed for gross misconduct and was granted anonymity or were unnamed in a non-sexual misconduct case during the timeframe specified.
Response 8:
I can confirm that there is no information held by Dyfed-Powys Police due to the fact that zero (0) officers given a final written warning were granted anonymity or unnamed in non- sexual misconduct cases in the timeframe specified.
Response 9 a - d:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
Financial Year |
Dismissed for Gross Misconduct (Male) |
Dismissed for Gross Misconduct (Female) |
2018/19 |
1 |
0 |
2019/20 |
2 |
1 |
2020/21 |
4 |
0 |
2021/22 |
1 |
0 |
Response 10:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
A total of one named male officer was given a final written warning in the timeframe specified.
Additional Request:
I can confirm that there is no information held by Dyfed-Powys Police due to the fact that zero (0) officers dismissed for gross misconduct in sexual misconduct or special case hearings were given anonymity or were unnamed in the timeframe specified.
Please note: With regards to the questions relating to anonymity, anonymity only applies to misconduct cases that are referred to a Misconduct Hearing.
It should be noted that as a result of the systems adopted by Dyfed-Powys Police in relation to the recording of such information that the information released may or may not be accurate.
(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 08/07/2022)