Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FOI Reference: 757/2022
Request:
Please confirm how much has been spent in paying salaries of officers who were suspended on paid leave later:
a.) dismissed from the force
or
b.) found guilty of misconduct after they resigned/retired from the force?
Please provide this information for the past five financial years (up to the 2021/2022 financial year).
Clarification: Please ensure the data reflects the total amount paid - so if it spans three years, divide the figure by three, and provide this figure for each consecutive year, so that it provides a fair and accurate reflection?
Further Clarification: If it's easier, you can also just provide the total amount in the year that they were eventually dismissed.
Response:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
Year |
PC Rank |
2017/2018 |
£0.00 |
2018/2019 |
£70,402.55 |
2019/2020 |
£58,055.80 |
2020/2021 |
£44,178.59 |
2021/2022 |
£27,476.35 |
Please note: All officers were of PC rank.
It should be noted that as a result of the systems adopted by Dyfed-Powys Police in relation to the recording of such information that the information released may or may not be accurate.
(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 23/01/2023)