Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FOI Reference: 688/2024
Request:
Clarification Q:
Clarification A:
Thank you for your response. To clarify, 'reports' or 'incidents' should be changed to read 'crimes', so these questions focus on CCTV's use in criminal investigations that the force has conducted.
I also wanted to mention that I've received responses from other forces, and it seems that most of the requests pertaining to CCTV fall under Section 12 of the FOI Act, with cost of the task exceeding appropriate limit and fees.
If this is also the case for Dyfed-Powys Police, I'd ask that all previous questions related to CCTV are disregarded, and these requests are considered instead:
Response:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does not hold the information requested, this is due to the fact that it is not possible for us to identify how much time officers have spent reviewing CCTV. The audit functionality of the system used can tell us who has reviewed the footage but not for how long.
(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 08/08/2024)