Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FOI Reference: 441/2024
Request 1 - 4:
- how many Subjects breached their licence conditions,
- how many Subjects breached the SCPO itself
Response 1:
I can confirm that there is no information held by Dyfed-Powys Police due to the fact that SCPO are applied for by the Director of Public Prosecutions, and not police.
Response 2:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
2014 = 1 x SCPO
2018 = 5 x SCPO
2022 = 1 x SCPO
2014, 1 x 2018 and 2022 relate to the same nominal.
Release to community:
2020 x 1
2021 x 1
2022 x 1
2023 x 1
Response 3:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below in regards to breach.
Breach SCPO = 1
Please note: Probation Services are responsible for management of any period of licence supervision on release from custody.
Response 4:
I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold the information requested, as outlined below.
A total of zero (0) subjects have not breached the SPCO and had their SCPO discharged.
Additionally, Dyfed-Powys Police can neither confirm nor deny that it holds any other information with regard to an exempt body as the duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply by virtue of the following exemption:
Section 23(5) Information supplied by or concerning certain Security Bodies.
Section 23 is a class-based absolute exemption and there is no requirement to consider the public interest in this case.
Confirming or denying the existence of whether any other information is held would contravene the constrictions laid out within Section 23 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in that this stipulates a generic bar on disclosure of any information applied by, or concerning, certain Security Bodies.
It should be noted that as a result of the systems adopted by Dyfed-Powys Police in relation to the recording of such information that the information released may or may not be accurate.
Furthermore, it should also be noted that Police forces in the United Kingdom are routinely required to provide crime statistics to government bodies and the recording criteria is set nationally. However, the systems used for recording these figures are not generic, nor are the procedures used locally in capturing the crime data. It should be noted that for these reasons this force's response to your questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other response you may receive.
(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 05/06/2024)