RTCs 2021-22 A470/C2018 Talerddig 910/2025

FOI Reference: 910/2025

Request:

We require to know how many traffic incidents have occurred on the junction and within the boundary of the Talerddig village* on the A470 and the C2018, the road to Bont Dalgadfan from January 1^st 2021 – December 31st 2022.

We also require to know

1. The nature of these incidents
2. When did they happen, date and time of day or night
3. How many vehicles were involved
4. What emergency services attended
5. How many people were injured including emotional damage
6. What damage was done to property and the cost of repairing the damage
7. Did it result in proceeding against the offender, if so give details

*For clarity – for the A470 between the signage for Talerddig

For the C2018 from the signage for Talerddig on the A470 (Caron side) to the first cattle grid past Talerddig Farm – there is no sign on the C2018)

Clarification:

Clarification was sought and the applicant confirmed that they require information relating to all road incidents. However, if this was too much information then to narrow the information to ‘Accidents’ defined as:

“Road traffic collision involving a mechanically-propelled vehicle on a road or other public area which causes:

• Injury of damage to anybody
• Damage to a vehicle
• Damage to property built on, attached to , growing in. or otherwise forming part of the land where the road is
• Injury or damage to an animal – other than one being carried in/on that vehicle”

Response A – G:

I can confirm that Dyfed-Powys Police does hold some the information requested as outlined below however for some parts of the request we can neither confirm nor deny that information is or is not held by virtue of Section 40(5) – Personal Information. Please see the end of the document for the application of the applied exemption.

Please note: The data/information in the below table has been taken from two different systems. Each system records data/information in a different way, consequently there maybe more information available from one system compared to the other.

Explanation of the applied exemption: Section 40(5) – Personal Information.

Section 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) places two duties on public authorities. Unless exemptions apply, the first duty at Section 1(1)(a) is to confirm or deny whether the information specified in a request is held. The second duty at Section 1(1)(b) is to disclose information that has been confirmed as being held. Where exemptions are relied upon Section 17 of FOIA requires that we provide the applicant with a notice which: a) states that fact b) specifies the exemption(s) in question and c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.

Dyfed-Powys Police can neither confirm nor deny that it holds information pertinent to this request as the duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply, by virtue of the following exemptions:

Section 40(5) - Personal Information

Section 40(5) Personal Information, in this case is an absolute exemption as outlined below and as a consequence there is no requirement to carry out a public interest test as to whether neither confirming nor denying the information exists is the appropriate response. 

Section 40(5) – Personal Information

The duty to neither confirm nor deny under this section of the Act arises if confirmation as to whether the requested information is or isn’t held would breach any of the data protection principles contained within Part 3 - Chapter 2 of the Data Protection Act 2018. Under Section 34 within Chapter 2 “The Controller in relation to personal data is responsible for and must be able to demonstrate, compliance with” Chapter 2.  Such information would not be confirmed as held under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 unless there is a strong public interest. One of the main differences between the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 2018 is that any information released under FOI is released into the public domain, not just the individual requesting the information and disclosure under the Act must be made with that in mind. As such, any release that identifies an individual through releasing their personal data, even third party personal data is exempt.

Personal data is defined under Section 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018 as:

“(2) ‘Personal data’ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable living individual (subject to subsection (14)(c)).

(3) ‘Identifiable living individual’ means a living individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to—

(a) An identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data or an online identifier, or

(b) One or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of the individual.”

All members of the public including those employed by the force have an intrinsic right to privacy and these rights are protected by virtue of the Human Rights Act, the Data Protection Act 2018 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and a public authority must not interfere with that right. Any release of the information subject to the exemption is likely to compromise those rights.

Data Protection Act 2018

Part 3 – Law Enforcement – Chapter 2 Principles Section 35

The first data protection principle:

“(1) The first data protection principle is that the processing of personal data for any of the law enforcement purposes must be lawful and fair.”

General Data Protection Regulation

Article 5 of the GDPR – ‘Principles relating to processing of personal data’ provides:

“1. ‘Personal data’ shall be

(a)        Processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject (‘lawfulness, fairness and transparency);

(b)        Collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes; further processing for archiving purposes in the public interest…

2. The controller shall be responsible for, and be able to demonstrate compliance with, paragraph 1 (‘accountability’).”

A disclosure under Freedom of Information is a release of information to the world in general and not an individual applicant.  Therefore, simply confirming or not that such information, if any, were held would disclose personal information about an individual. The Police Service will not confirm to the world in general whether or not information is held if to do so would disclose personal information of an individual. In this case, due to the level of breakdown requested for each traffic incident the information requested in respect of point G relates specifically to personal data of an identifiable individual and any disclosure, by citing an exemption or stating no information held would clearly breach the Data Protection Act. As a consequence I am satisfied that Section 40(5) Personal Information exemption is applicable. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, this represents a Refusal Notice for this particular request.  No inference can be taken from this refusal that the information you have requested does or does not exist.

(This is a response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and disclosed on 13/01/2026)